ALAWON: American Library Association Washington Office Newsline Volume 10, Number 50 May 7, 2001 In this issue: Supreme Court Decision on Tasini Major Pronouncement on Copyright Law in the Digital Age Yesterday, the Supreme Court affirmed the copyright privileges of freelance writers in The New York Times v. Tasini, issuing a decision that is a major pronouncement on issues of copyright law in the digital age. The Court voted that freelance writers can retain copyright privileges on works that were originally published in newspapers and periodicals and then were licensed by the publishers to commercial electronic databases. In siding with the plaintiffs in the case, the Court rejected the publishers' argument that a ruling for the authors would have "devastating" consequences. ALA commends the Supreme Court ruling that calls for compensation to freelance writers for the use of their work. However, this ruling presents significant challenges to libraries because of the possibility for incomplete archival databases. This is because older works currently reside in electronic databases for which seeking retroactive permission may be difficult and because the publishers have threatened to delete the articles from the databases to reduce the publishers' liability for infringement. Freelance authors should be compensated for their work, but the public interest in having access to their material should also be recognized and respected - without having to create a crisis that the publishers had suggested would be inevitable if the authors were to be victorious in this case. The ALA/ARL amici curiae (friend of the court) brief suggested that there are constructive ways for the courts to address the remedial phase of this case which is fair to freelance authors, the commercial electronic database publishers and the public. The Supreme Court expressed the same view, noting that the parties, the courts and Congress could "draw on numerous models for distributing copyrighted works and remunerating authors for their distribution." Whatever the outcome of this case, the nation's libraries and archives continue to provide access to the historical record of periodicals and newspapers. The Supreme Court's ruling recognizes that certain archival media, such as microfilm and microfiche, do not infringe freelance authors' copyrights. Thus the historical record will continue to be available to researchers and the public, which is a matter of utmost importance to librarians. ****** ALAWON (ISSN 1069-7799) is a free, irregular publication of the American Library Association Washington Office. All materials subject to copyright by the American Library Association may be reprinted or redistributed for noncommercial purposes with appropriate credits. To subscribe to ALAWON, send the message: subscribe ala-wo [your_firstname] [your_lastname] to listproc@ala.org or go to http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon. To unsubscribe to ALAWON, send the message: unsubscribe ala-wo to listproc@ala.org. ALAWON archives at http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon. ALA Washington Office, 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 403, Washington, D.C. 20004-1701; phone: 202.628.8410 or 800.941.8478 toll-free; fax: 202.628.8419; e-mail: alawash@alawash.org; Web site: http://www.ala.org/washoff. Executive Director: Emily Sheketoff. Office of Government Relations: Lynne Bradley, Director; Mary Costabile, Peter Kaplan, Miriam Nisbet and Claudette Tennant. Office for Information Technology Policy: Rick Weingarten, Director; Jennifer Hendrix, Carrie Russell and Saundra Shirley. ALAWON Editor: Bernadette Murphy.