ALAWON: American Library Association Washington Office Newsline Volume 8, Number 76 July 28, 1999 In this issue: [1] ALAWON Filtered from E-mail as "Business Inappropriate" [2] ALA Files Comments on NTIA Proposal [1] ALAWON Filtered from E-mail as "Business Inappropriate" In the July 22 ALAWON (v8, n74), we reported that Rep. Ernest Istook (R-OK) had introduced H.R. 2560, the Child Protection Act of 1999. The bill may be offered as an amendment to appropriations bills that will likely be acted on this fall. Using language provided in the bill, we said that H.R. 2560 would require libraries and schools -- as a condition of receiving federal funds from any federal agency for the acquisition or operation of computers -- to install filters to protect children from certain material on the Internet. An action alert encouraged library advocates to invite members of Congress into libraries to see local Internet services firsthand during the upcoming congressional recess (August 9 - September 7). We received a return notification from at least one ALAWON subscriber's e-mail provider stating that the ALAWON was "electronically scanned and found to be business inappropriate." We have contacted the provider and await their response. If any other ALAWON subscribers did not receive this or any other ALAWON, they are archived at http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon [2] ALA Files Comments on NTIA Proposal On July 22 ALA filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to the possible requirement that all applicants for E-rate discounts have acceptable use policies governing their Internet access. The FCC's June 23 Request for Comment was based on an April 7 proposal from the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration. ALA made the following points in its filing: 1. The decision to have use policies should not be imposed by the federal government and, in particular, should not be made part of the E-rate discount application process for libraries and schools; 2. If policies are to be required, applicants should be given maximum flexibility in establishing their form and content with no federal involvement in decisions on content; 3. Any requirements should not place additional administrative burdens on what is already a complex application and administrative process; 4. Any such requirements should not be applied retroactively to the Year 2 funding process; and 5. The range of possible methods for administering or enforcing use policies is so broad that they should not be dictated by a federal program. The full comments are available in PDF format at http://www.ala.org/oitp/fcc072299.pdf ****** ALAWON (ISSN 1069-7799) is a free, irregular publication of the American Library Association Washington Office. All materials subject to copyright by the American Library Association may be reprinted or redistributed for noncommercial purposes with appropriate credits. To subscribe to ALAWON, send the message: subscribe ala-wo [your_firstname] [your_lastname] to listproc@ala.org or go to http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon. To unsubscribe to ALAWON, send the message: unsubscribe ala-wo to listproc@ala.org or go to http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon. ALAWON archives at http://www.ala.org/washoff/alawon. ALA Washington Office, 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 403, Washington, D.C. 20004-1701; phone: 202.628.8410 or 800.941.8478 toll-free; fax: 202.628.8419; e-mail: alawash@alawash.org; Web site: http://www.ala.org/washoff. Editor: Lynne E. Bradley; Managing Editor: Deirdre Herman; Contributors: Sally Benson, Mary Costabile, Carol Henderson, Peter Kaplan, Carrie Russell, Saundra Shirley, Claudette Tennant and Rick Weingarten.