ALA/JMRT EXECUTIVE BOARD
Sunday, July 7, 1985
Hyatt Regency Hotel--Water Tower Room
8:00–10:30 pm
In attendance were: Lynetta
Lewis Alexander, Elinor Barrett, Vivian Beech, Diane Bisom, Karen M. Bohrer,
Pat Brill, Diane J. Cimbala, Myrtis C. Collins, Dominique Coulombe, Donna
Cranmer, Anders C. Dahlgren, Larayne Dallas, Cathy Doyle, Karin E. Ford, Elaine
Franco, Lysa Wegman French, Mary Jo P. Godwin, Ted Goodman, Beth Hanson, Mary
F. Hicks, Erlene Bishop Killeen, Jim Kopp, Charles E. Kratz, Ruth A. Magnussen,
Laura Osegueda, Valerie A. Platz, Becky Taylor, Rhonda Harris Taylor,
Loretta Turnage, Bobbi Walters, J. Linda Williams, Randy Wilson, Janice
Woo.
President
Charles Kratz opened the meeting at 8:20 pm. All present introduced themselves.
OLD
BUSINESS
SECRETARY Diane Cimbala
asked if there were any corrections to the Midwinter Minutes. Kopp said he should
have appeared in the list of attendees at the Sunday, January 6 meeting.
Dahlgren moved that the minutes be accepted with that correction. Taylor
seconded the motion. The minutes were approved unanimously.
Taylor moved that the agenda
be amended to allow Mrytis Collins to report on the Shirley Olofson Committee.
Bohrer seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
Platz stated that she had
investigated the problem of the JMRT stickers, as she had wanted one. Tony
Leisner of Quality Books told her he had them in his office. Platz said the
message here is that we are responsible for getting things to conference. It is
not the responsiblity of benevolent vendors. Kratz suggested that Dahlgren
obtain the stickers from Leisner, so they will always be in JMRT's hands.
Dahlgren pointed out that part of the confusion this year stemmed from the fact
that there was no JMRT booth.
AFFILIATES
COUNCIL REPORTS
Elinor Barrett, AFFILIATES
COUNCIL PRESIDENT, announced that Quality Books had given her money to produce
the booklet JMRT's Best. It will
be used as a basis for state level JMRT workshops. Barrett also announced the
winners of the Affiliates Council elections: Terri Tomshyschyn is now First
Vice President, and Kathy Kaldenberg is Second Vice President/Suite
Coordinator.
Barrett referred the
Executive Board to the report she distributed Saturday, in which the Affiliates
Council proposed to initiate a New Librarian Citation. A similar award is
offered in
1
5
states. Barrett has asked an ad hoc group to consider the feasibility of
offering such an award on a national basis, focusing on the type of award, its
administration, etc. Barrett explained that there were two
administrative options: one to make the award of standard national award format
like the 3M or Olofson Grants. The other option would be to keep the award at
the state level. Barrett delineated the pros and cons of the two types of
award, and asked if the award should be monetary or simply recognition in the
form of a plaque. Discussion centered around selection criteria, Nebraska's
experience with the award, and how the award fits JMRT's long-range planning
document. Killeen pointed out that the 3M Professional Development Grant cites
winners for "outstanding achievement"--she wondered rhetorically if
it is possible that the 3M Grant is already recognizing outstanding new
librarians, thus filling that part of the Goals and Objectives?
Further
discussion centered around whether the 3M Grant is meant to recognize potential
in new librarians, or achievement by those who didn't need to be
"nudged" into professional involvement. Dahlgren pointed out that
Scotty McAuley and next year's 3M committee will be working on this question.
Doyle commented that like the proliferation of JMRT meetings in recent years,
it looks like we're experiencing a boom in awards. Platz suggested that a
state-level award would reach more people and could be accessible to those who
otherwise feel isolated. Hicks suggested that the award could be set up in two
tiers: finalists would be selected at the affiliate level, and from that group
national winners could be chosen. Further discussion ensued about the benefits
of a state vs. national award. Finally, Barrett asked if we might be
considering the award merely because it addressed an unfilled objective.
Williams expressed the concern that that was exactly what was happening.
Barrett asked if the states that currently grant the award should continue it.
Williams said yes, and the national JMRT should offer as much assistance as
possible in the forms of publicity, funding, etc. Kratz suggested that the new
Affiliates Council discuss the award further, based on the Executive Board's
reactions. Killeen suggested that a motion be made to refer the issue to the
Long Range Goals and Objectives Committee.
Dahlgren
moved that the Executive Board direct the ad hoc Long Range Goals and
Objectives Committee to examine Goal D, Obj. 1 in the current Goals and
Objectives document and recommend continuation, revision, or recision in the
new Goals and Objectives document, to be developed during 1985-86. Cimbala
seconded the motion. There was no discussion, and the motion was passed
unanimously.
AFFILIATES COUNCIL FIRST
VICE PRESIDENT Elaine Franco referred the Board to her written report. She
described the hospitality suite and the flyers being distributed there,
summarizing Affiliates Council activities. Franco said she has requested a list
of national JMRT members listed by state from ALA, so that she can establish
new contacts. Franco discussed her fiscal
2
report, and the new Affiliates
Development Guidelines. Franco said she has edited the Guidelines
even further, and hopes to have a mail vote of approval from the new Executive
Board.
Dahlgren moved that the
Board direct Franco to revise the Affiliates Development Guidelines and
that the revision be put to the 1985-86 officers for a vote. Barrett seconded
the motion, which passed unanimously. Franco added parenthetically that the Guidelines
will be less expensive this year, as they will be in outline form, and will be
published as a brochure or flyer. She said the revisions would be ready for
consideration halfway between this conference and the Midwinter meeting in
January.
AFFILIATES COUNCIL SECOND
VICE PRESIDENT AND SUITE COORDINATOR Beverly Martin will offer her report at
the Tuesday Executive Board meeting.
REPORTS
OF COMMITTEES
CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS
COMMITTEE CHAIR Ruth Magnussen reported that the dues increase was passed; JMRT
dues are now $l0.00.
ORIENTATION COMMITTEE Chair
Randy Wilson gave an assessment of the Saturday Orientation as one that was
quite successful. Publicity about the program was very good, so about 400
people attended. The speakers were excellent, and time was used well--the
information roundabout was effective this time. Mary Hicks had assisted the
Orientation Committee by obtaining $100 from the ALA Membership Committee, and
Fred Pachman secured $250 from vendors.
STUDENTS
TO ALA PROGRAM AND RECEPTION COMMITTEE Chair Karin Ford
reported
that Sunday afternoon's program was very well attended.
She
thanked JMRTers Jo Crawford and J . Linda Williams for serving
as
program panelists. Approximately 125 people attended the SALA reception at ALA
Headquarters. Food left over from the party was taken to the JMRT Suite. Betty
McCartney did a great job lining up the caterer and handling other local
arrangements duties, and the rest of the committee did a fantastic job, as
well. The Guidebook produced by the Local Arrangements Committee was really
nice, and as Carol Rickert's library handled design and printing costs, there
was money left over.
PUBLICITY
CHAIR Bobbi Walters cited good publicity as one reason the programs were well
attended. She is in the process of creating guidelines for committee chairs to
use in order to help the Publicity Committee do their jobs well. She will
distribute new publicity forms on
Tuesday. Post publicity has gone well, too--she has been told that the American
Libraries staff will look favorably on news items about JMRT programs and
activities. The SALA Program is on cassette, and both Art Plotnik and Gordon
Flagg of American Libraries were at the program.
Kratz related the discussion
to the need for FOOTNOTES to carry reports of conference programs to JMRTers
who were unable to
3
attend conference. Walters
commented that with the tapes available, transcriptions could he provided.
Options were discussed, including obtaining speakers' notes, publishing
proceedings, etc. Kratz concluded the discussion by thanking Walters and the
program committee chairs for a job well done.
FUNDRAISING CHAIR
Janice Woo reported that there were 200-250 mugs to sell through the ALA store.
Receipts showed they were selling briskly. As there was a mistake on one order
of the mugs, we will receive a 25% refund on them. Woo reported that we had not
yet received the refund. Kratz asked her to check on this. Woo did not pursue
the idea of selling mailing tubes. Kratz asked Hicks if she had looked into
selling mailing tubes for membership promotion. Hicks replied that the ALA
store is selling them—therefore JMRT should consider something
else as a fundraiser.
Jim
Kopp, SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE chair reported that his committee was meeting for
the first time at the Chicago Conference. Kopp reviewed the history of the
EBSCO/JMRT Scholarship. One snag that developed since Midwinter has been that ALA publicity has advertised the
scholarship at $2000 instead of $1000. Several interested parties thought the
first award would be for the 1985-86 school year. Kopp said it was a good thing
they were wrong—the Scholarship Committee is still working on logistics. Kopp
reviewed the committee formation: there are 5 JMRT members, each serving a
two-year term, an EBSCO representative [Joe Weed] and a library school faculty
member, Walter Allen of the Univ. of Illinois.
Kopp
reiterated that the deadline for applications is December 16, 1985—the deadline
shared by all ALA awards. The problem of one person receiving all ALA
scholarship awards has finally been acknowledged by the ALA Awards committee,so
ALA will delay announcement of awards to verify that only one person wins each
award. Consequently, the Scholarship committee will have to select several
runners-up in order to allow for the possibility that our top choice winner
will have received another, more generous ALA award. Kopp said the committee
met for the first time Friday July 5; plans are underway for an application
form, and a publicity campaign.
Kratz
reread the text describing who may apply for the scholarship: it will go to someone beginning advanced
study in the field of librarianship, including those pursuing 5th year
certification, the MLS, or doctoral studies.
Kopp expressed concern about
the audience for the scholarship: how can it be reached? Cimbala observed that
library schools are probably the best bet—students writing to ask about
admissions will also ask about financial aid. Schools will be happy to send on
additional aid information. Williams said it depends on the dean of the
school—her library school did not send financial aid information. We also need to
reach practicing librarians through the professional literature. Doyle asked if
4
ALA
published a list of ALA scholarships. Hicks suggested that publicity be sent to
the Committee on Accreditation.
Kopp was also aware that the
timing of the award was odd--people will have to apply for it before they've
been accepted to library school. The
first year will be an experimental one. Kratz said the first winner will begin
coursework in Fall 1986. Cimbala pointed out that the schedule shouldn't be a
major problem, as many people apply for graduate school and financial aid
simultaneously. The people who are good enough to win the award will most
assuredly be accepted to library school. Kopp stated that acceptance at a
library school is not a criterion for winning the award, but the recipient has
to be enrolled in an ALA accredited school to receive the scholarship check.
Kopp said one other
potential problem will be choosing between a student beginning MLS studies and
one who has already been established in the field and is seeking the DLS. Hicks
asked if someone getting the MLS who decides to get a 6th year advanced study
certificate or the DLS or Ph.D. without stopping would be eligible for the
scholarship. Kopp said such a person should apply, and emphasized that these
and other issues would be discussed at the Scholarship Committee meeting on
Monday.
Dahlgren moved that the
meeting be extended until 10:15p.m.
Taylor seconded the motion; it pass unanimously.
SHIRLEY
OLOFSON MEMORIAL AWARD COMMITTEE chair Myrtis Cochran Collins stated that the
awards program up to this point had been successful. She read the list of winners (Lynetta Lewis Aleander, Rosemary
Huff Arneson, and Rhonda Lynette Harris Taylor) and noted that they had been
acknowledged at the Awards Breakfast. Collins thanked the Publicity Committee
for their assistance, and said that the new flyers are already out. Karin Ford
will be next year's chair.
Collins referred the Board to her written proposal,
in which the Olofson Committee suggested that the award be graduated to reflect
increasing registration costs. Killeen asked why the on site registration fee
was used to calculate the award. Collins said the highest figure has always
been used for this award. Williams argued that the award should cover more than
registration to ALA Annual Conference. Larayne Dallas said she felt the honor
of winning the award is great in itself, and the money for registration is a
big help. Killeen asked if the award
will continue to be granted to 3 people. Collins said yes, but that question
should be assessed every 5 years.
Discussion ensued about whether the Award should be increased to
encompass funds above and beyond registration. Dahlgren pointed out that the
Committee's time table proposal could be used as a planning tool: for example,
the award could be the greater of $177.00 or $25.00 over registration. The
award could be adjusted at Midwinter.
Taylor moved we accept the Olofson Committee's
recommendation for
5
implementation of the
increase of the award, according to appendix A of the Committee's proposal.
(See attachment) Cimbala seconded the motion.
Williams offered a friendly amendment that the dollar amount for the
award be doubled through 1987, then be restructured for the next 6 years.
Taylor rejected the friendly amendment. The original motion carried, with
Williams voting against it.
Cimbala reluctantly moved
that the meeting be extended to 10:30pm. Dahlgren seconded the motion, and it
passed unanimously.
LIAISON
REPORTS
LIAISONS COORDINATOR Anders
Dahlgren announced that all JMRT liaisons would meet Monday to review a working
paper for long-range planning. He also expressed the wish that he had had more
time to fulfill the duties of liaisons coordinator.
LIBRARY EDUCATION ASSEMBLY
LIAISON Diane Cimbala reported that through the LEA, the Students to ALA
Program obtained cosponsorship (and some prestige) from the Standing Committee
on Library Education.
Larayne Dallas, BETA PHI MU
LIAISON, stated that she had been sowewhat frustrated because her role in Beta
Phi Mu had not been an active one. She suggested that next year's liaison ask
Beta Phi Mu how JMRT can help out. Dallas also commented that she had met Ed
Holley at a BPM reception and he had expressed his apologies for dropping out
as keynote speaker at the SALA program. He claimed he received insufficient
follow-up. Cimbala, supervising officer for the Committee, defended SALA chair
Karin Ford, who had maintained contact with all of the SALA panelists
throughout the 1984-85 year.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There being no
announcements, Dahlgren moved that the meeting be adjourned. Bohrer seconded
the motion, and it carried unanimously.
The meeting concluded at 10:15pm.
Respectfully
Submitted,
Diane
J. Cimbala
6