Author: Elizabeth Brown <elizabeth.bruwn@ibid.li
rary.gatech.edu> at Tzltemet
Date: 6/19/96 4:48 PM
Priority: Normal.
TO: Suzanne Byron at Library
TO: LSILL@VMA.CC.ND.EDU at IXIIXNET
TO: district@penn.‘com at INTE
TO: LIBMJH@langate.gsu.edu at INTERNET
TO: msamson@cms.cc.wayne.edu at INTERNET
TO: kimberley robles@csufresno.edu at INTERNET
TO: bwick@cz%le.cudenver.edu at INTERNET
TO: j-mamer@tamu.edu at INTERNET
Subject: NMRT#2
---------------------------Message Contents ----------------------------
New Members Round Table
Minutes of the Meeting Held Sunday, January 21,1996
Members present:
Liz Brown, Suzanne Byron, Emerita Cuesta, Betsy
Fordon, Laura Galvan-Estrada,
Carol Gill, Linda Golian, Marilynn Green, Judy
Hambrick, NMIXT Liaison, Pat
Henderson, Paula Hering, Mary Ju Howard, Carol Kern,
Jon Marner, Kimberley
Robles, Ronald Russ, Michael Samson, Laura Sill, Bob
Wick, Elaine Yontz
Elaine called
the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone present.
Announcements
Elaine reminded everyone of the Leadership Development
Breakfast on Monday at 7:30 a-m. It would feature the ALA presidential
candidates; NMRT Officer candidates, and NMRT Council candidates, Former
members of NMRT would talk about getting involved in ALA beyond NMRT.
Carol reminded everyone of the Social on the
Riverwalk.
Betsy reminded everyone to sign the Council petitions+
Director - Michael Samson
Michael Samson reported that the joint Conference
Arrangements meeting had gone very well, The Orientation Program at Annual was entitled
“Taking a Bite Out of ALA's Big Apple” and would feature Major Owen as speaker
(“The end of librarianship as we know it”). The Local Arrangements Committee
planned to put together tip sheets on topics such as safety and places to eat,
The President's Program was to focus on career development in an era of
downsizing. The
theme for the Social would be “A Sparkling Manhattan
night.” The Conference Arrangements would have another meeting at Annual prior
to all the programs.
Ronald Russ, Chair of this year's Orientation
Committee, suggested acknowledging representatives' form other parts of A.LA
who were sent to the Orientation meeting. Members present thought this to be a
good idea, but NMRT would want to clarify with these representatives that they
would not speak but be pointed out so that attendees could speak with them
later. Betsy also noted that
this practice should be written into the Handbook.
Suzanne made the MOTION that the Orientation Committee
be enabled to invite other divisions and roundtables to send representatives to
orientations at Annual and Midwinter; the representatives would be introduced
and would be able to provide literature from their groups.
The motion PASSED.
Betsy suggested that “older” NMRT people be introduced
so people could approach them after the program. Elaine asked Directors to
remind their committee chairs to amend their Handbook entries as needed after
their year was up.
MACE Director - Suzanne Byron
Sue reported that the 3M/NMRT Professional Development
Grant and the Olofson Award winners would be selected after the conference
because the chairs of those two committees were unable to come to Midwinter at
the last minute. She was confident that the situations were well in hand. Sue
then let individual committee chairs bring forth their own issues.
Library School Outreach - Linda Golian
Linda reported that the Library School Outreach
Committee wished to drop the raffle for NMRT membership. The Board agreed to
let the committee decide. Linda would make another library school mailing this
spring, and the deadline for submissions would be April 1. Linda also noted
that she would make mailing labels available to those members wishing to make
their own mailings.
Exhibit Contact and Relations - Carol Kern
Carol reported on the requests that have come in and
the status of her contacts with different vendors. Carol was confident about
receiving support from 3M, Gale and Highsmith. Carol asked
for requests to be on the proper form for records-keeping. She also emphasized that
she needed requests in order to approach vendors. She had received no requests
this year from the Booth Committee to approach Quality Books. Directors should
look at their committees' needs and
. Carol's report to make sure that they requested
necessary funding.
Carol thought the $500 request for SALA was too low
for NYC. The major downsizing of the Exhibitors Roundtable might affect our
traditional relationships since, in general, downsizing means that not a lot of
money would be available.
Ann Snoeyenbos, Local Arrangements Chair, had called
around New York City to get cost estimates for a coffee/tea reception- She
concluded the average cost was 6-8 dollars per person, $1300-1400 would, then,
be a very basic estimate for a simple reception. It was noted that some vendors
simply don't like to support food events.
Elaine noted that groups that need new money for a
project should talk to the ALA Fund before contacting a vendor.
Linda and Bob suggested using non-library sources of
funding. The mayor's office also had Conference services that could help people
gain funding. In the worst case scenario that pursuing talking to the ALA Fund
for Libraries came up short, Carol thought perhaps we could shift Orientation
money. She also suggested that we have a mixer with no refreshments.
In light of the popular speaker at the Orientation
Program, Carol suggested that we ask for 400 instead of 300 briefcases from
EBSCO to ensure that “true orientees” get them. People who were not true
“orientees” (and did not need the briefcases) might attend just for the
speakers. Members present suggested that the program agenda and other related
information be distributed separately to everyone attending and the briefcases
only to the “true orientees.” Elaine reminded everyone
that the leftover briefcases should go to the booth.
Carol pointed out the problem caused by the Friendly
Booth Award judging taking place during board meetings: not many members were
available to be judges. Carol outlined suggestions, and Elaine promised that a
solution would be worked out, either with scheduling times for Board meetings
or arranging for the meetings to be at the Convention Center with the
Exhibits,The latter option might be difficult, but Judy Hambrick promised to
assist in this attempt. Elaine
noted that Friendly Booth was very high profile and
resolving this matter was important.
Grassroots Grants Program - Pat Henderson
Baker & Taylor withdrew support for the Grants
last year; the Committee's charge this year had been to evaluate the Grant
Program and make a recommendation for its future. The biggest problem was not
the nature of the grant but getting a large pool of applications. The grants
were only as strong as the state organizations. Another problem was publicity
for the grant, which could be rectified very easily. The committee felt that
the grant should be continued with efforts made for better promotion within the
states and that the appropriate persons pursue funding for the Grants program-
.
Carol wondered if NMRT could apply for a grant. Sue
noted that Quality Books had expressed interest in Grassroots Grants, We should
consult ALA and the Fund for America's Libraries. While grants of $250 would
come to $15,000 a year for the whole program, the group felt that the particulars
of the program and funding could be worked out later.
A MOTION was made stating that NMRT supported the
continuation of the Grassroots Grant Program in concept; and that the Exhibit
Relations and Grassroots Grant committees should be enabled to work together to
pursue funding. The motion PASSED.
Role of minorities' recruitment - Laura Galvan-Estrada
At present, the Minorities Recruitment Committee was
in the process of evaluating its charge and deciding what to pursue next. The
members present discussed the possibility of the committee sponsoring a program
and the allocation of NMRT resources to support this effort, Kim Robles
reminded the group that this example underscored the importance of the
Resources Allocation Committee and a monitoring system for NMRT Resources.
Laura showed a brochure that the committee had
prepared outlining its role. The consensus was that the brochure almost implied
that the Minorities Recruitment Committee itself was the key to getting
involved in NMRT.
Laura also questioned if there was an overlap between
Library School Outreach and Minorities Recruitment. Linda Golian clarified that
Library School Outreach was a channel for the information.
Committee member Emerita Cuesta pointed out that the
committee had been, in essence, preaching to the converted. She expressed a
desire to reach further out, such as to paraprofessional groups. She expressed
a concern for the need to encourage minorities to apply to library school. The
Board applauded this approach.
Elaine declared that this committee was very important
to NMl3.T and that she could see several exciting areas in which the committee
could continue. For instance, when ALA calls on NMRT each fall for names for
possible committee appointments, the NMRT President could consult with the
Minorities Recruitment Committee. Importantly, the committee could focus on
establishing relationships with diversity-related groups throughout ALA, such
as the Black Caucus, to help get new members of ALA from all backgrounds
involved in NMRT and ALA.
The Committee could also identify what the committee
has done in the past and produce a document to present to the Board.
Laura and Emerita noted that the committee wished to
have a different name that would emphasize commonalties rather than differences.
Sue made a MOTION that the group could consider a
different name for themselves. Kinn SECONDED. The motion PASSED.